Probiotics: A Promising Shield against PFAS-Induced Gut Toxicity

Authors

  • Lalu Kumar Author
  • Disha Author
  • Md Moidul Islam Author
  • Ruhit Ashraf Desh Bhagat University image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64261/42za9a22

Keywords:

PFAS (Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), Forever chemicals, Environmental persistence, Human health impacts, Bioaccumulation, Toxic legacy

Abstract

PFAS are a huge family of enduring synthetic chemicals commonly present in industrial and consumer goods because of their hydrophobic and oleophobic characteristics. They have caused significant health concerns to the people around the world because of their environmental stability and bioaccumulation capacity, which has resulted in contamination of water, soil, wildlife and human beings. PFAS has been linked to several negative effects in the event of chronic exposure, such as liver damage, thyroid dysfunction, immunotoxicity, developmental abnormalities, and heightened risks of cancer. Recent studies show that probiotics are an exciting gut-based treatment to counteract PFAS toxicity. Certain strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium can lower the absorption of PFAS by binding to the gastrointestinal tract, repairing intestinal barrier function, altering bile acid metabolism, and possibly biotransforming it. The preclinical evidence indicates that probiotics may help to reduce the inflammation caused by PFAS and improve the toxin excretion, yet the evidence is mostly animal-based. Major gaps are present such as the absence of adequate human clinical testing, incorrect dosage, and variation in efficacy by strain. Although probiotics are a natural and inexpensive adjunct method, their combination into PFAS mitigation strategies is still to be validated. To effectively control the exposure of PFAS and related health hazards, the use of a multidisciplinary method that incorporates scientific studies, regulatory intervention, and community education is necessary.

Author Biographies

  • Lalu Kumar

    B. Pharmacy (Student), School of Pharmacy, 

  • Disha

    Assistant Professor, School of Pharmacy, 

  • Md Moidul Islam

    Assistant Professor, School of Pharmacy, 

References

[1] A. Phillip, "Understanding per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Environmental persistence, health risks, and regulatory challenges," European Journal of Scientific Research and Reviews, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 199-211, 2025.

[2] E. Panieri, K. Baralic, D. Djukic-Cosic, A. Buha Djordjevic, and L. Saso, "PFAS molecules: a major concern for the human health and the environment," Toxics, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 44, 2022.

[3] S. Yang, H. Dong, X. Gou, L. Chen, Y. Zhang, and J. Wu, "Exposure to Per‐and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and the Risk of Prostate and Ovarian Cancer: An Epidemiologic Meta‐Analysis," American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 399-412, 2025.

[4] S. E. Fenton et al., "Per‐and polyfluoroalkyl substance toxicity and human health review: Current state of knowledge and strategies for informing future research," Environmental toxicology and chemistry, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 606-630, 2021.

[5] R. A. Brase, E. J. Mullin, and D. C. Spink, "Legacy and emerging per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances: analytical techniques, environmental fate, and health effects," International journal of molecular sciences, vol. 22, no. 3, p. 995, 2021.

[6] J. Liu, L. Song, J. Zhan, Y. Zhong, and Z. Shi, "Occurrence of legacy and alternative per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances in serum from high exposure population and their disrupting effects on serum lipids and thyroid function," Science of the Total Environment, vol. 878, p. 162988, 2023.

[7] H. Holmquist, P. Fantke, I. T. Cousins, M. Owsianiak, I. Liagkouridis, and G. M. Peters, "An (eco) toxicity life cycle impact assessment framework for per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances," Environmental science & technology, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 6224-6234, 2020.

[8] L. G. Gaines, "Historical and current usage of per‐and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): A literature review," American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 353-378, 2023.

[9] Z. Wang et al., "A New OECD Definition for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances," (in eng), Environ Sci Technol, vol. 55, no. 23, pp. 15575-15578, Dec 7 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c06896.

[10] I. T. Cousins et al., "Strategies for grouping per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to protect human and environmental health," (in eng), Environ Sci Process Impacts, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1444-1460, Jul 1 2020, doi: 10.1039/d0em00147c.

[11] A. Maerten, E. Callewaert, J. Sanz-Serrano, L. Devisscher, and M. Vinken, "Effects of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances on the liver: Human-relevant mechanisms of toxicity," (in eng), Sci Total Environ, vol. 954, p. 176717, Dec 1 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176717.

[12] A. Karamat, R. Tehrani, G. D. Foster, and B. Van Aken, "Plant responses to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): a molecular perspective," (in eng), Int J Phytoremediation, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 219-227, 2024, doi: 10.1080/15226514.2023.2232874.

[13] F. Spyrakis and T. A. Dragani, "The EU's Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Ban: A Case of Policy over Science," (in eng), Toxics, vol. 11, no. 9, Aug 22 2023, doi: 10.3390/toxics11090721.

[14] L. Zhao et al., "Insight into the binding model of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances to proteins and membranes," (in eng), Environ Int, vol. 175, p. 107951, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107951.

[15] A. Tokranov, Z. Hopkins, B. Lindsey, and B. Jurgens, "PFAS Are Widespread, Not Ubiquitous: Clarifying Misconceptions About the Prevalence of "Forever Chemicals"," Environmental science & technology, vol. 59, 06/09 2025, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5c03878.

Downloads

Published

04.04.2026

How to Cite

Probiotics: A Promising Shield against PFAS-Induced Gut Toxicity. (2026). Pan-African Journal of Health and Psychological Sciences, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.64261/42za9a22

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>